This domain is a Michael A. Wills domain holdings property and is available for purchase. Contact us or submit your confidential offer to domains at willslaw.ca for consideration and response. Discover more domain properties for sale on our domains for sale listing page.
Quick-check the ahrefs domain rating and link profile: click here.
Minimum offer: $140.00 (USD)
Active Sites Not for Sale
Terminated.Law
Employment lawyer for: employment law
Weclose.Law
Residential real estate lawyer for: real estate law
Employer.Law
Management-side employment lawyer for: workplace harassment law
More Top Domains for Sale
Latest Posts from Terminated.Law
- Robinson v Heinz Company: A Claim of Constructive Dismissalby Michael Wills on December 16, 2024
Constructive Dismissal in Leamington: A Closer Look BackgroundThis case stems from H.J. Heinz Company of Canada LP’s decision to close its Leamington, Ontario plant in 2014. Karen Robinson, a long-serving employee with nearly 40 years of tenure, was affected by the plant closure. Although Heinz […]
- Hilton v K & S Services: A Matter of Jurisdictionby Michael Wills on December 14, 2024
Tecumseh Resident Secures Jurisdiction in Ontario for Constructive Dismissal Claim In Hilton v. K & S Services Inc., the Ontario Court of Appeal affirmed that Ontario courts have jurisdiction over a constructive dismissal claim brought by Craig Hilton, a Tecumseh, Ontario resident, against his […]
- Ontario Employment Standards Act Key Protections: Your Rights Explainedby Michael Wills on December 13, 2024
Introduction The Employment Standards Act, 2000 (ESA) is the cornerstone of workplace rights in Ontario. This legislation outlines the minimum standards employers must meet to ensure fair treatment of employees. Understanding your rights under the ESA empowers you to identify violations and take […]
Latest Posts from Weclose.Law
- Closing Costs for Ontario Homebuyersby Michael Wills on October 31, 2024
Learn about closing costs for Ontario homebuyers with Weclose. From legal fees to title insurance, we guide you through all the expenses for a smooth closing. The post Closing Costs for Ontario Homebuyers first appeared on Weclose.
- First-Time Homebuyer Rebates and Incentivesby Michael Wills on October 31, 2024
Explore first-time homebuyer rebates and incentives in Ontario. From tax rebates to shared-equity loans, Weclose guides you through savings opportunities. The post First-Time Homebuyer Rebates and Incentives first appeared on Weclose.
- Buyer and Seller Rights Ontario Real Estateby Michael Wills on October 31, 2024
Understand buyer and seller rights Ontario real estate. From disclosures to fair compensation, Weclose guides you through a fair and protected transaction. The post Buyer and Seller Rights Ontario Real Estate first appeared on Weclose.
Recent Decisions from Ontario Court of Appeal
- R. v. Grant, 2025 ONCA 288 (CanLII)on April 15, 2025
Criminal procedure — Appeals — Fresh evidence — Possession of a loaded firearm — Appellant convicted under s. 95(1) of the Criminal Code — Fresh evidence from related proceedings admitted on appeal — Crown conceded that related trials were stayed due to disclosure issues — Should the appellant’s conviction be set aside? — Appeal allowed, conviction quashed, and stay of proceedings entered — Criminal Code, R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46, s. 95(1)Evidence — Fresh evidence on appeal — Related proceedings — Appellant sought to admit fresh evidence from related cases where stays of proceedings were entered due to disclosure issues — Crown conceded that fairness required the appellant’s conviction to be set aside — Should fresh evidence be admitted on appeal? — Evidence admitted as it impacted the integrity of the criminal processConstitution — Charter of Rights — Section 24(1) — Fair trial — Appellant argued inability to make full answer and defence due to redacted disclosure — Crown conceded that fairness required a stay of proceedings — Should a stay of proceedings be entered under s. 24(1) of the Charter? — Stay of proceedings entered to preserve fairness and integrity of the criminal process
- Wade v. Avery, 2025 ONCA 275 (CanLII)on April 14, 2025
Family — Vesting orders — Equalization of net family property — Enforcement mechanisms — Appellant challenged the trial judge’s vesting order granting sole title of the matrimonial home to the respondent — Did the trial judge err in granting a vesting order under the Family Law Act without evidence of the home’s current value? — Discretionary power to grant vesting orders under ss. 9 and 34 of the Family Law Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. F.3Family — Child support — Retroactive and ongoing support — Appellant argued that the trial judge’s orders were inconsistent with prior support orders and the respondent’s suggestion to waive future support — Did the trial judge err in ordering retroactive and ongoing child support? — Trial judge’s discretion to make support orders based on evidence of arrears and ongoing obligationsCivil procedure — Appeals from uncontested trials — Exceptional circumstances — Appellant sought to appeal an order from an uncontested trial — Should the Court of Appeal entertain an appeal from an uncontested trial in the absence of exceptional circumstances? — Appeals from uncontested trials are limited to cases with clear merit or injustice, per Lamothe v. Ellis, 2022 ONCA 789
- Diaz v. Bol, 2025 ONCA 277 (CanLII)on April 14, 2025
Family — Parenting time — Material change in circumstances — Parenting schedule — Children’s best interests — Motion judge found material change based on children’s age and expressed wishes — Did the motion judge err in finding a material change in circumstances? — Governing principles for revisiting parenting orders where a material change is allegedFamily — Child support — Capital gains — Imputed income — Respondent’s capital gains partially included in income for child support purposes — Appellant found underemployed, income imputed — Did the motion judge err in determining the quantum of child support? — Proper treatment of capital gains and imputed income in child support calculationsFamily — Costs — Costs award in family law — Costs deducted from child support payments — Mixed success of parties — Respondent successful on central issue of parenting time — Did the motion judge err in awarding costs to the respondent? — Discretionary nature of costs awards in family lawFamily — Vaccinations — Children’s decision-making capacity — Vaccination decisions left to children based on maturity and intelligence — Did the motion judge err in determining that the children could make their own decisions regarding vaccinations? — Framework for assessing children’s capacity to make medical decisionsCivil procedure — Fresh evidence on appeal — Appellant sought to introduce fresh evidence on appeal — Evidence found to be repetitive of evidence led below — Should the appellant’s motion to introduce fresh evidence on appeal have been granted? — Test for admitting fresh evidence on appeal